The Human Reassertion
The Difference between Progress and Drift.
Now accepting keynotes for Q1/Q2 2026
The SuperSkills Era: a 60-minute session for leadership teams, a practical framework on building human capability that thrives alongside AI. Research-backed. Immediately actionable. In person or virtual. UK, Europe, global.
→ Book a discovery call | → Explore: thesuperskills.com
In addition to this newsletter, I recommend a few others. All free. Check them out here.
Friends,
For decades, progress followed a clear logic. Faster was better. Scale meant strength. Data promised truth. Automation delivered efficiency. That logic worked, right up to the point where it began to hollow out the very things it was meant to improve.
The Human Reassertion is the moment when societies realise that the systems built to optimise work, intelligence, and decision-making have reached their limits. Not because they failed, but because they succeeded too well. Technology did exactly what it was designed to do, and in doing so exposed what it cannot replace.
This is not a backlash against technology. It is not nostalgia for a slower world. It is a structural correction after decades of over-optimisation. As intelligence becomes cheap and abundant, the value of being human changes shape.
For most of the modern era, professional worth was tied to knowledge, execution, and speed. Expertise was scarce. Information moved slowly. Authority belonged to those with answers. That world has gone. Answers are now instant. Drafts are infinite. Analysis is automated. The bottleneck is no longer production. It is judgement.
AI has not taken jobs first. It has unbundled competence. Tasks have been stripped out of roles and redistributed across systems. Pattern recognition, summarisation, forecasting, optimisation now run without human involvement. What remains is the residue. Deciding what matters. Choosing between imperfect options. Acting without certainty. Holding responsibility when outcomes are ambiguous.
This residue has always existed. What is new is that it is now the core of the work.
Here is the uncomfortable part. We did not arrive here by accident. We built these systems. We rewarded speed over sense-making, output over understanding, confidence over discernment. We traded judgement for efficiency because it worked. We accepted optimisation because it delivered results. The erosion was gradual enough to ignore, until it wasn’t.
The result is a growing sense of dislocation. People feel replaceable even when performing well. Productive but unfulfilled. Informed but unsure. Surrounded by intelligence yet starved of meaning. This is not burnout. It is capability drift.
Judgement does not appear on dashboards. Calm does not scale. Ethics cannot be automated. Wisdom resists metrics. Yet these are the capabilities organisations are now quietly desperate for.
You can see the reassertion once you know where to look. Leadership is shifting away from certainty towards credibility. The leaders people trust are not those with the strongest opinions, but those who can hold complexity without pretending it is simple.
Hiring is moving, unevenly but unmistakably, away from narrow task execution towards judgement-heavy responsibility. Curiosity is overtaking static expertise as the trait that compounds. Education is fracturing as credentials lose their guarantee of relevance.
Culture is adjusting too. Polished perfection is losing power. Authenticity, even when rough, carries more weight than optimisation. Trust is drifting away from institutions and towards individuals who can explain clearly, admit uncertainty, and take responsibility for their choices.
This is the system correcting itself. When everything is optimised, optimisation stops differentiating. When intelligence is everywhere, judgement becomes scarce. When speed is default, stillness becomes signal. Many organisations respond to this moment by doubling down on tools, dashboards, and acceleration. They mistake automation for progress and efficiency for effectiveness. They optimise harder just as the returns collapse.
The organisations that endure will make a different move. They will treat human capability as the constraint, not the afterthought. They will invest in judgement, sense-making, and ethical reasoning as core infrastructure. They will ask not how fast they can move, but whether they are moving in the right direction.
At a societal level, the Human Reassertion forces a question that was postponed for too long. If machines can do most of what we once valued, what remains distinctly human, and how do we cultivate it deliberately? The answer is not romantic. It is practical. Humans integrate context, values, emotion, and consequence. We navigate trade-offs. We act when rules break down. We create meaning not by optimising, but by choosing.
That capacity has always mattered. It was simply easier to ignore when systems were slower and stakes were lower. Now it is unavoidable. The Human Reassertion is not a passing mood. It is a structural shift in how value is created and recognised. Systems that fail to account for it will not collapse loudly. They will simply stop making sense to the people inside them.
AI will continue to accelerate. Automation will deepen. Intelligence will become more abundant.
And in a world where almost everything can be delegated, the ability to choose, to judge, and to take responsibility will quietly become the difference between progress and drift.
Stay Curious - and don’t forget to be amazing,
Rahim Hirji Author, SuperSkills (2026) | Keynote Speaker | Advisor
Building human capability for the AI era.
Tools I Use:
Jamie: AI Note taker without a bot
Refind: AI-curated Brain Food delivered daily
Meco: Newsletter reader outside your inbox
Prompt Cowboy: Prompt Generator
Manus: Best AI agent to do things for you